|
''Chamaesipho columna'' is the type species for the barnacle genus ''Chamaesipho''. Originally, species concept, as refined by Darwin〔(472 ) consisted of ''C. columna''. Spengler's 1790 description included specimens from "Otaheite" (Tahiti), which were far larger than any of the three described species. As ''Chamaesipho'' is restricted to Australia and New Zealand, and Spengler's Tahiti material lacked opercular plates, it is no longer included as ''Chamaesipho''. Spengler's written description agrees with ''Chamaesipho''.〔(472 ) Spengler's Tahiti material is thought to be New Zealand ''Epopella'', mislabeled.〔 Later authors recognized ''Chamaesipho columna'' populations really represented three species. Moore, 1944, recognized a second New Zealand population with sufficient anatomical differences to warrant description as ''Chamaesipho brunnea''. The two species substantially overlap, and are sympatric.〔 Australian ''Chamaesipho'' were seen to represent a third species, which was proposed as ''Chamaesipho tasmanica''.〔 Neither New Zealand species occurs naturally in Australia. == Description and Discussion == Adult shells are very small, rostrocarinal diameter of not more than 9 mm in solitary specimens, 4 mm in columnar growth individuals. Height of crowded individuals reaches to 16 mm, 6 in solitary specimens.〔 Shell is whitish, and erodes to show pitting. Juvenile shell wall of 6 plates, becoming four plated by diameter of .5mm, and sutures fuse together, cannot be seen in adult, even when etched with acid. Basis is membraneous.〔 Opercular plates are deeply interlocked with sinuous articulation, and subject to considerable environmental wear, making large variations in individual appearance and shape.〔(471 ) Articulation is not nearly as deep as in ''Chamaesipho brunnea''.〔 Interior of scutum shows a wide shallow adductor pit, and small lateral depressor pit. There is a distinct low rounded scutal adductor ridge, in contrast to that of ''C. brunnea'', which has at best poorly developed ridge. Scutal articular ridge, which in chthamaloids is large central lobe on tergal margin, is rounded. In ''C. brunnea'', this lobe is very large and rectangular.〔 Tergum is much narrower than in ''C. brunnea'', with articular margin bearing two rounded relatively shallow re-entrants. ''Chamaesipho brunnea'' shows a single very deep re-entrant. Tergal depressor crests are prominent in both species, with fewer (to about 4) in ''C. columna'', versus up to 7 in ''C. brunnea''. Crests are not visible from exterior in ''C. columna''. Neither species shows a tergal spur.〔 Moore, 1944〔 provides full descriptions of hard and soft part anatomy for both juvenile and adult stages of ''Chamaesipho columna''. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Chamaesipho columna」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|